CNNs Andy Serwer fired the medias latest salvo against American
business with his January 19 swipe at corporate salaries. The
Fortune magazine editor shut out defenders of corporate executives
whom he hinted might be getting paid for a pulse while suggesting
that a famous actress earns every penny she makes.
Julia Roberts makes a movie, she gets big bucks, more
than $20 million-a-film, Serwer opened his story quickly adding,
Thats okay, her movies usually earn many times that. You could say
she makes money the old-fashioned way, she earns it. But, asked the
business contributor, can the same be said for all those business
executives who make millions? Are they really worth it?
Serwer then strung together some examples of what he
considered excess, including former Disney CEO Michael Eisners $576
million-a-year salary and former General Electric chief Jack Welchs
company-furnished New York penthouse. But in praising a Hollywood
star while slamming Wall Street ones, Serwer insulted his audiences
intelligence. As much as Julia Roberts is paid for her labor as an
actress, she is also paid for being Julia Roberts: a Hollywood star
who draws audiences, and with them, box office revenue by the
millions.
Any number of actresses could play the title role in
Erin Brockovich and command a much lower salary than Roberts for
the same amount of work weeks of grueling long days of rehearsal
and filming but Robertss unique ability to rake in a large
audience, and with it, profitability, is a significant part of how
she earns every penny of her $20 million per movie.
In the same way, any number of businessmen can attempt
to run a multi-million-dollar enterprise like Disney or General
Electric while commanding a significantly lower salary. But its the
unique ability of an Eisner or a Welch in their respective
industries to inspire confidence in consumers, shareholders, and
employees that factors into paying those men significantly more than
other job candidates.
This common-sense principle is what economists refer to
as
economic rent, or a measure of market power: the difference
between what a factor of production is paid and how much it would
need to be paid to remain in its current use.
But if Andy Serwer really doesnt believe this
principle works in the real world, Id gladly be willing to take his
gig on American Morning for half of whatever hes paid.
Whos Worth More?
suggested reading
Free Speech