Twitter censors a screenshot from a Forbes article: A Twitter user complained about a Biden administration amicus brief, and how it can easily go very wrong. He wrote: "How the Constitution is erased The Biden Admin filed a brief supporting warrantless confiscation of guns. Using an exemption designed for cops to move abandoned vehicles off roads But the Leftists want to expand that to any "reasonable action" by cops." He linked to a Forbes article about the situation titled "Biden Administration Urges Supreme Court To Let Cops Enter Homes And Seize Guns Without a Warrant." He also included a screenshot of a relevant passage from the Forbes article, in which he highlighted a key phrase. The context for this phrase was a sentence that began: "The ultimate question in this case is therefore not whether the respondent officers' actions fit within some narrow warrant exception," and ended with the highlighted passage: "but instead whether those actions were reasonable." Twitter placed a sensitive content filter over the screenshot, forcing users to click through the interstitial filter in order to see the screenshot. Not only do such filters give the impression of inappropriate content, similar filters have been shown to reduce user interaction with content.