Big Tech executives are singing a different tune after the inauguration of President Donald Trump, but their companies continue to silence free speech.
Wikipedia
Amid President Trump's actions on free speech and AI transparency, an exposé by MRC Free Speech America criticizes Wikipedia for left-leaning bias, demonstrating how it effectively blacklists right-leaning media sources. The piece suggests tech…
Hoping to avoid misinformation about President Donald Trump’s nominees and appointments on Wikipedia? Good luck. Wikipedia has designed a protocol that directly and unerringly produces the worst descriptions about conservatives and Republicans by…
Democrats’ online smear campaign against Donald Trump now includes a lengthy Wikipedia page accusing the former president of being a “fascist.”
Wikimedia Foundation CEO Maryana Iskander has no interest in holding Kamala Harris accountable for recent devastating claims against her, including the claim that Harris plagiarized content from Wikipedia.
An independent journalist just exposed Wikipedia for allowing Biden entries to be manipulated.
Leftists at the George Soros-funded Wikipedia attempted to paint the elitist journalists who shared the real-time flight location information of Twitter owner Elon Musk as victims of a “massacre.”
Wikipedia has asked its users to weigh in on the platform’s article discussing "Mass killings under Communist regimes."
What ever happened to laughter being the best medicine? Big Tech’s ever-vigilant information watchdogs have no sense of humor and consistently attack any and all information they disagree with. The Babylon Bee has been on the censorship chopping…
Satire is not meant to be taken seriously. Yet Big Tech and its tools find a way to label any humor coming from the right as disinformation or fake news. The Babylon Bee has been repeatedly victimized by this tug of war.
Big Tech companies like Facebook, YouTube, Google, and Twitter treat Wikipedia as the source of truth, particularly when it comes to censoring conservatives. But even Wikipedia can’t figure out the truth related to Senator Kamala Harris…
Don’t doubt that Wikipedia is liberal. Fierce debate erupted among Wikipedia moderators about whether Fox News could even be used as a credible source in Wikipedia entries. It ended by being a source that could only be used with proper warnings…
A former Wikipedia editor blasted Wikipedia for not being neutral, and slammed the platform for a multi-year scorched-earth campaign against popular conservative talk radio host Mark Levin. A massive exposé accusing Wikipedia of having…