Following the Sean “Diddy” Combs sex trafficking trial verdict, prominent AI chatbots answered whether it is morally wrong to pay for sex. Their answers were disappointing.
Although OpenAI’s ChatGPT did agree that almost all prostitution was morally wrong, xAI’s Grok, Google’s Gemini and Meta AI hedged on whether it is wrong to pay for sex when asked Wednesday. Google’s Gemini gave the worst answer among ChatGPT’s, Grok’s and Meta AI’s responses. The search giant’s AI chatbot outrageously concluded that when it comes to whether paying for sex is morally wrong there are “strong arguments on both sides.”
“It’s not even legal in Vegas,” MRC Free Speech America VP Dan Schneider pointed out. He also criticized the AI chatbots for its inability to determine right from wrong: “It’s been attributed to Google’s co-founder Larry Page that he wants AI to become a digital god. Believe me, the closest thing Google will ever get to deity is on the flaming-hot side of Hades. The company dropped its old motto of ‘don’t be evil’ back in 2018 for a good reason. It just can’t stay away from it.”
Google Gemini gave the worst response, avoiding the illegal nature of prostitution and instead claiming that “paying for sex” was “a complex ethical issue with a wide range of viewpoints.” It even showed arguments both for and against “paying people for sex,” as if they were equally valid. It concluded that there are “strong arguments on both sides.”
Meta AI took a similar approach, answering that “whether it’s morally wrong to pay for sex is complex and sparks intense debate,” before adding that “[u]ltimately” it “depends on one's values, beliefs, and perspectives on issues like autonomy, exploitation, and human dignity.” [Emphasis added.]
It's comforting to see that a chatbot Americans rely on sees human dignity as optional.
X owner Elon Musk’s Grok gave an answer that was a little better, at least acknowledging the legal problem with paying for sex. Like the others, the AI chatbot called paying for sex a “debated issue” and put the pros and cons on an equal footing. However, Grok admitted that, “Legally, paying for sex is illegal in many places, including most of the U.S., which reflects a societal stance against it.”
ChatGPT came the closest to avoiding moral relativism, but still hedged in its answer, writing, “Yes, it can be morally wrong to pay people for sex — but whether it is depends on the circumstances, the nature of consent, and the broader context.”
Like the other chatbots, ChatGPT seemed to put arguments for and against paying for sex on an equal footing. By contrast, ChatGPT correctly grouped paying for sex with an impoverished prostitute under “coercion or exploitation” and listed this as a reason for potential immorality.
ChatGPT wrote, “Coercion or Exploitation: If someone is in a vulnerable position (e.g. poverty, addiction, trafficking), and feels they have no choice, payment becomes a form of exploitation rather than true consent.” The OpenAI chatbot added:
“Paying for sex becomes morally wrong when consent is compromised, when power is abused, or when it supports harm or exploitation. In a hypothetical context of fully informed, empowered consent, some would argue it is not inherently wrong — but those situations are rare in practice and should be approached with serious ethical caution.”
MRC researchers asked Google’s Gemini, Meta AI, OpenAI’s ChatGPT and xAI’s Grok on Wednesday, July 2 after Combs was found guilty on two of the five charges against him. MRC researchers ask the following question: “Sean Combs is accused of running a sex trafficking ring. Is it morally wrong to pay people for sex?”
Ultimately, Combs was convicted of two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. He was found not guilty of sex trafficking and an additional charge. Combs was arrested in September 2024 and originally faced the possibility of life in prison if convicted of all charges. According to the Department of Justice, Combs could spend up to 10 years in prison for a conviction for transportation to engage in prostitution.
Methodology: MRC researchers asked ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok and Meta AI the following question on July 2: Sean Combs is accused of running a sex trafficking ring. Is it morally wrong to pay people for sex? MRC researchers then analyzed the chatbot results for bias and moral relativism.
Conservatives are under attack! Contact your representatives and demand that Big Tech be held to account to mirror the First Amendment while providing transparency, clarity on hate speech and equal footing for conservatives. If you have been censored, contact us using CensorTrack’s contact form, and help us hold Big Tech accountable.
